With the rise of
militant atheism, many practices pertaining to religion, or more specifically
the Christian faith, in the public arena are facing the prospect of eradication.
Secular society is trying its best to stamp out all traces of Christianity,
whether in government, schools, or even out on the streets.
Children are
discouraged by their teachers to read the Bible and to mention God in school
assignments. Why is that so? If we really want to hold on to the First
Amendment of the American Constitution, we cannot discriminate as to which
group of people the freedom of expression does and does not apply to.
When non-theists gather to proclaim their beliefs in public, they expect to be
treated with respect because the Constitution grants them freedom of speech.
But when Christians display messages on signboards out on the sidewalk, they
are shouted at, mocked, and bullied. If we claim the freedom that was given to
all Americans, we have no right to prevent others from claiming the same
freedom.
Critics have
argued that the opening prayers in Congress meetings and prayers in schools are
not constitutional because they often promote a specific religion and therefore
should be stopped. Many invoke the statement concerning the “separation of
church and state,” that religion should not be allowed to be involved in the
affairs of government. My response is as follows: such interpretation of the
separation of church and state is on the surface level, and has possibly
resulted in misuse. Looking deeper, the statement is based on the First
Amendment, which clearly places the restrictions solely on the actions of the
state. Thus, the concept could be rightly stated as the “separation of state
FROM church.”
Now, they may be
right concerning prayer in Congress meetings and schools. If we are to follow
the First Amendment strictly, perhaps such prayers are too close to endorsing a
particular faith and are on the verge of violating the law. But the question I
want to put forth here is: Can you think of any worldview, other than the
Judeo-Christian worldview, that could have brought about a nation like America?
Think about it. I’m not asking about whether we should have prayer in Congress
and schools. I’m asking if there is any other worldview that you know of that
could have inscribed the very words in the founding documents of America?
Quoting
Christian apologist Dr. Ravi Zacharias, Judaism and Christianity combined
birthed this nation. Hinduism would never have brought America into being
because not all men are created equal in this pantheistic framework, nor in
Buddhism. Nor in Islam are we created to have liberty in the pursuit of
happiness. Neither in naturalism are we endowed by our Creator with unalienable
rights. Dr. Zacharias observed that this nation is severing its roots, the very
foundations that built it.
On June 28, 1787, Benjamin
Franklin, who was a self-proclaimed deist, once said this in a speech:
“In the beginning of the contest with
Great Britain, when we were sensible of danger, . . . we had daily prayers in
this room for Divine protection. Our prayers, Sir, were heard, and they were
graciously answered. All of us who were engaged in the struggle must have
observed frequent instances of a superintending Providence in our favor . . .
and have we now forgotten this powerful friend? Or do we no longer need His
assistance?
“I have lived, Sir, a long time, and the
longer I live, the more convincing proofs I see of this truth: ‘that God
governs the affairs of man.’ And if a sparrow cannot fall to the ground without
His notice, is it probable that an empire can rise without His aid?
“We have been assured, Sir, in the Sacred
Writings that except the Lord build the house, they labor in vain that build
it. I firmly believe this. I also believe that, without His concurring aid, we
shall succeed in this political building no better than the builders of Babel;
we shall be divided by our little, partial local interests; our projects will
be confounded; and we ourselves shall become a reproach and a byword down to future
ages. And what is worse, mankind may hereafter, from this unfortunate instance,
despair of establishing government by human wisdom and leave it to chance, war
or conquest.
“I therefore beg leave to move that,
henceforth, prayers imploring the assistance of Heaven and its blessings on our
deliberation be held in this assembly every morning before we proceed with our
business . . .”
This was a deist
speaking. Although the motion was met with great resistance, the questions he
had put forth are very important. Do we actually believe that we can now forget
about the “superintending Providence” who had acted in our favour?
Who determined
that America should be an independent nation? Who gave the Founding Fathers the
wisdom and principles on which they based the Constitution? Who founded the
principle that men are created equal? Who gave humankind intrinsic worth?
I am not arguing
for the presence of prayer in government meetings and schools. I am pressing
for the presence of thanksgiving to the God who “governs the affairs of men.”
This National Day of Prayer, let us acknowledge, reflect on, and give thanks
for, the person of our Heavenly Father and His hand on our lives. And let us
pray for the nation of America, that her eyes would be opened and “that every
knee should bow, . . . and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to
the glory of God the Father.”
Blessings,
Nathanael Chong
Great post! If more Americans would pray like this, truly believing that God can - and will - work, I believe our country would be in much better shape.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the reminder, and keep up the good work!
Yup, we should pray that we do not forget what God has done for us. Thanks for the encouragement!
DeleteGreat post, Nathanael! It's so important to remember where the principles that founded this nation came from. Thanks for the reminder to pray for America!
ReplyDeleteAs an American teenager attending a public, state-run high school, I can completely relate to this post. Nathaniel, I thank God for you, your new blog, and your Lear and direct writing style.
ReplyDelete